Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  gamefreak101 | April 27, 2008
  Well, it does look below par, but in what stage of production is Silent Hill Homecoming in exactly? If we're seeing just a few months of production, I see nothing wrong with the quality.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Gothic Girl | April 27, 2008
    It's actually been in production since 2004.
    
    But that's not what the comments ere talking about ... They're talking about the decline in graphics since the game was revealed. Me and jmac were talking about the character changes in another SH5 article, but by the looks of it, the entire appearance of the game has been changed. (unless the more recent batches of screenshots are just dodgy ones).
    But this last bunch is definitely nowhere as detailed or generally "nice to look at" as some of the screens that were shown last year.
    Heck, some of the new ones look almost like PS2 graphics ... especially when you compare them to screenshots from other survival horrors for PS3, namely RE5 and Siren:NT.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      jmac353 | April 27, 2008
      That doesn't mean they've actually been working on the engine or anything in 2004. Not at all. They probably didn't even start to get into in-game assets until 2006 at the earliest and I'm pretty sure they've created their own engine.
      
      All that being said, Silent Hill 5 looks fine to me.
    • 
      2 thumbs!

      Gothic Girl | April 27, 2008
      oops. double post
      
      [there really needs to be a "delete own post" feature for Gamegrep]
• 
  0 thumbs!

  InnerDemon | April 27, 2008
  They look fine to me. o_0. I just hope that it has good gameplay. That quality and good gameplay should be good enough for me...
• 
  0 thumbs!

  theundertakergonzo | April 27, 2008
  Personally i thought they were pretty good, people were complaining but i don't have any complaints. As long as the storyline is good aswell as gameplay being good then i'll settle for it.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | April 27, 2008
  _{Ugly, are you serious? Are these people on dugs? They look great to me. Better than the previous one.}
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Seeker X | April 28, 2008
    That's compared to Siren though...in which, while they're not a mess...they're certainly not up to par.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  shadow993 | April 27, 2008
  They look fine to me.
  
  Besides, it's not all about the graphics. The game should deliver, and that is a whole 'nother area entirely.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  BANDITO ATTACK | April 27, 2008
  i love how when ANY nintendo title has lame ass 14-polygon-model graphics.. its cute, and " O THTS JUS NEN10DO ^____^ "
  but when a ps3/360 has somewhat subpar graphics, it makes headlines and gets trashed and called an 'ugly mess'
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  Gothic Girl | April 28, 2008
  People really think they look good?
  Tbh, it looks like shit pulled off a PS2 game.
  Heck, Maria from SH2 had more detail than that blonde woman in the SH5 screen.